![]() Source at Compare to uBlock which as not been maintained and updated for more than 2 years, since 2015, and is trying to monetize an open source project. Mostly because as of May 2017 Ublock Origin is still actively maintained and updated. ![]() For those not familiar with those names, uBlock Origin is better than uBlock. Which means that corporation sales your privacy for profit :( Source at There is a controversy around ABP and its related for profit corporation trying to monetize ABP via ad whitelisting. uBlock Origin has a better track record at fully protecting your privacy, than AdBlock Plus (ABP).uBlock's sole purpose is to give users the means to enforce their own choices. The plugin was originally created by gorhill and got help from. Many thanks to haploc who let me know in the comments In a Reddit post, the reasoning behind the move from uBlock to uBlock Origin is further explained. Update : uBlock has been renamed to uBlock Origin. It is expected that uBlock Origin is compatible with any Chromium-based browsers. There is also a development version in the Chrome Web Store if you want to test uBlock Origin with the latest changes: see uBlock Origin dev build. Users are best placed to know what is or is not acceptable to them. Remove Adblock Plus and install uBlock, you won’t regret it. You can install the latest version manually, from the Chrome Web Store, or from the Opera add-ons.The uBlock project does not support Adblock Plus' "Acceptable Ads Manifesto", because the "Acceptable Ads" marketing campaign is really the business plan of a for-profit entity.The user decides what web content is acceptable or not in their browser.Including 3.8+ millions users on Firefox and 8.9+ millions users on Chrome Lightweight on memory and CPU resources.More secure because its code is publicly available for review and contributions on GitHub at It is owned and supported by a friendly community. Chrome will be similar to Apple’s Safari browser, which now supports “ content blockers” that operate in a speedy, standard way. This change may speed up Chrome by limiting what all browser extensions can do-ad blocking extensions and other extensions. If this (quite limited) declarativeNetRequest API ends up being the only way content blockers can accomplish their duty, this essentially means that two content blockers I have maintained for years, uBlock Origin (“uBO”) and uMatrix, can no longer exist.īeside causing uBO and uMatrix to no longer be able to exist, it’s really concerning that the proposed declarativeNetRequest API will make it impossible to come up with new and novel filtering engine designs, as the declarativeNetRequest API is no more than the implementation of one specific filtering engine, and a rather limited one (the 30,000 limit is not sufficient to enforce the famous EasyList alone).Įven Hill notes that ad blockers aren’t going away if this goes through. Raymond Hill notes that, if this change goes through, ad blocker uBlock Origin and content filter uMatrix can’t do anything special: However, declarativeNetRequest uses an Adblock Plus-style filtering system. Chrome itself does the blocking without waiting for extensions to respond, and this should be faster. Chrome won’t have to wait for extensions to weigh in while loading a page.Īd blockers must use the “ declarativeNetRequest” API to tell Chrome what they want to block. Extensions can only watch these events, and that should speed up page load times. ![]() On the left, you can see a list of blocked advertisers and trackers. There is also an element picker and zapper mode. If the proposed change goes through, extensions won’t be able to block events with this API. uBlock Origin has numerous options for filtering, trusted sites, rules, and more.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |